What to Look for in a... Photo Editor

Everyone is talking about Photoshop, right? That sounds like the industry standard and the de-facto tool that guarantees success right out of the box. Maybe. Just to be clear, the point of this review is not to bad-mouth Photoshop. It is a powerful tool with a long history of innovation for photo work. Alongside Photoshop, many alternatives, open-source and commercial, have risen in stature and feature-set to openly compete for artists. At the crux of a good photo working application, there are some core things it should have to make it not just useful, but valuable. 

Intuitive Design

  • Tools should be foremost functional, which depends heavily upon the ability to effectively use its features. Designs should be built with logical positioning, allowing for optimal use of the space and giving users options to customize the overall layout according to their unique style and workflow. If too much time is required to find features or they are too deeply buried in menus, then it's best to look for a better tool. As a minor caveat, some good tools do have a learning curve, but these should also have the benefit of a simple, logical progression that can be adopted and repeated easily. 


Customizatable Workspace

  • Widgets, dockers, or windows should be a default option, giving the opportunity to place controls were most natural. While the standard layouts provided by a tool are generally a good place to start, it should give freedom to customize and or limit the features needed most. Lack of layout flexibility suggests the tool is immature and will likely be a bottleneck for time. 


High Resolution Support

  • Some tools will offer powerful features, but will lack in ability to work in high resolution graphics. An example would be RAW photography images, which store large amounts of data within the image. Another would be creating a full-size poster graphic. The tool should support both importing and exporting in high resolutions (4k \ 3840x2160, or better). Without it, the creative and meaningful output is terribly hamstrung. 


Community Input

  • Developers who receive feedback from users and apply favorable changes are what distinguishes a tool for greatness. Before trying a tool look for respective user forums that can help gauge community involvement. The ability to influence and shape the usefulness should not be underestimated. 


Photoshop Alternatives (Tool, Link, Type, Free or Cost, Notes)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RAW Images and Paint.NET

It's OK to Feel Deflated

Where to Find Content Creator Tools and Resources